The Great Curse

I have two mechanics in Exalted that I have a serious love/hate relationship with. One is the Great Curse, the other are perfect defenses. I like the idea and intent behind both, but I’m deeply dissatisfied with how they were implemented. Leaving the issue of perfects for another day, I’m going to lay out my initial thoughts on how I’d like to handle the Great Curse in FATE/Exalted.

I have always enjoyed the concept of the Great Curse. An ancient curse that slowly causes you to betray everything you hold dear. An insidious darkness that creeps inside your soul and warps it until you aren’t you anymore. Something that makes you rationalize your actions as you give in to the darkness by inches.

At least that’s how I always thought it should work. In actual game play I always found it to be more of a “BAM! Now you’re a dick for a scene!” The way the limit breaks work always seems really jarring whenever a character would hit the tipping point.No organic slow decent into madness, just a sudden snap. “Oh, guess I just went into limit break. At least I get my willpower back as I wreck 5 sessions worth of effort.”*

The Dresden Files RPG has a mechanic called Sponsor Debt that I think may fit how I have always conceptualized the Great Curse. In Dresden, a character can enter into a bargain with a more powerful individual, cleverly called the Sponsor, to “borrow” some of the patron’s magic power. The finer details are much more complicated than that, but the quick and dirty version is the debtor can call on the Sponsor to power certain actions (spells, invoke an aspect for free, extra power, etc) as long as those actions are in line with the Sponsor’s agenda.

I think this mechanic can be adapted to fit the Great Curse fairly easily. The Sponsor becomes the curse itself, with its agenda being the tainting of the character. This would give players a bit more control over when the Great Curse effects them, by allowing them to twist what they’re doing subtly to gain those “free” effects. The debt could then be used as mostly unavoidable compells to represent when the Great Curse has a much stronger hold on the character. Feels like I’m on to something here, but it’s still not finished.

Another much simpler way to model the Great Curse is to have the character’s Trouble relate back to the curse. This certainly has the bonus of being simple, but I’m not as happy with it for some reason. I think it’s at least partially because I like the idea of the Great Curse as a force external to the characters. In the end I may just end up using both.

Further noodling is once again required.

This is very much a rough draft of the Great Curse and I’m sure it will change before I’m done. For now I think I’ll let this simmer in the back of my brain and come back to it later. Maybe a bit of aging will help things become clearer.

*I saw this happen first hand. Set backs can be fun, but to lose that much effort to a random die roll kinda took some of the starch out of the group.

This entry was posted in Mechanics. Bookmark the permalink.

3 Responses to The Great Curse

  1. Helmsman says:

    Why not work it like a damage track with wound aspects? You take the limit damage and you can buy it off with various negative aspects. You can either buy it off more often with smaller aspects so you’re a bit of dick more often, or you can hold off and buy a big aspect. The fact that the player has options means they’re more liable to play it correctly and explore and have fun with the disadvantages.

  2. Helmsman says:

    As for perfects… the solution for them in the original system was to create a new tier of successes. Perfect + Threshold successes. If two perfect actions oppose one-another, the one with the higher threshold successes wins. (They can be bought with the 2nd Excellency through combo’s and such.) If threshold successes are equal then defender wins ties. It shouldn’t be that hard to add a “Perfect” aspect keyword to certain actions in a similar way through FATE.

  3. The damage track idea for Limit isn’t a bad one. Something like what you describe would probably result in a system that feels very similar to the WW rules. Limit Consequences, like Touched by the Curse for a mild one or In the Throws of the Curse for a severe one, would give the players some options. They could be compelled and invoked, either by the GM or the player, to get the FATE points or bonuses. Probably would work well with a bit of effort.

    There’s also a couple issues with this method. Where does the Limit come from? An entire other subsystem would have to be added to handle it, either with Virtues like in the RAW rules or something else. Would it be connected to the compelling of a particular aspect? No matter how you handle it you’d be adding more crunch to what is supposed to a “rules lite” interpretation of Exalted.

    I also do see how have specific Limit track consequences would give the players more options for compels and invoking than simply connecting the Trouble to the Great Curse. Perhaps you can expand on what you meant?

    As far as the Perfects go, you’re right. They probably won’t be /that/ hard to model in FATE. The tricky part will be balancing them so they’re effective but don’t produce the dull, 3 hour long “slap fights” that Exalted 2E’s do. Mostly I just haven’t gotten to them yet.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s